RunUO Community

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

ICANN changing domain name rules

anybody;764882 said:
I can see that system being more efficient on search engines and parental control. You type hotel into the search engine and it'll probably pull up every site ending with .hotel. Force all porn sites to use the .sex extension and block all sites that end in .sex

Hi, there's this new thing called freedom, might want to check it out. While most porn sites would do it voluntarily, theres no need to force anything
 

Lysdexic

Sorceror
The problem is that it will never work. ICANN holds no jurisdiction over anything, they are strictly a set of rules and not laws. They cannot punish those who deviate, nor can they force the governments of those who deviate to punish. ICANN cannot even revoke an address or even mandate that a certain entity can no longer buy addresses.

I've wanted a .XXX or some other higher level domain for quite some time for ease of administration, but even the best admistrator knows that even if the whole world followed the rules and kept all the ill-sites in this range, there is no block on this planet that will work unless you literally pull the plug (and now with WiFi USB keyfobs, this don't even work). However, I have never wanted this for the aide of parents. If your kid is surfing porn, then it's your own fucking fault you weren't there with them to help guide them in this thing called life (I don't care if you choose to restrict or to educate, as long as you do something to protect them)... or did you forget that was your job in the first place?
 

J MaNN

Wanderer
Hey so, i was watching G4 (unbeatable banzuke ftw) and saw some info about this. Apparently, it will cost $50,000-$100,000 to register a special one. So i don't think we will see to many .hotels etc.
 

Rosetta

Wanderer
Radwen;764864 said:
@Rosetta:
This is not like what you are citing. This is like deciding that a right click will replace a double click and so on.
Its still clicking, its just changing how its done. Which in this case is pointless imo.

Another example would be the one button mac mouse to the two button pc mouse.
 

Rosetta

Wanderer
Lysdexic;764890 said:
The problem is that it will never work. ICANN holds no jurisdiction over anything, they are strictly a set of rules and not laws. They cannot punish those who deviate, nor can they force the governments of those who deviate to punish. ICANN cannot even revoke an address or even mandate that a certain entity can no longer buy addresses.

I've wanted a .XXX or some other higher level domain for quite some time for ease of administration, but even the best admistrator knows that even if the whole world followed the rules and kept all the ill-sites in this range, there is no block on this planet that will work unless you literally pull the plug (and now with WiFi USB keyfobs, this don't even work). However, I have never wanted this for the aide of parents. If your kid is surfing porn, then it's your own fucking fault you weren't there with them to help guide them in this thing called life (I don't care if you choose to restrict or to educate, as long as you do something to protect them)... or did you forget that was your job in the first place?

Now that's a good point.
 

anybody

Sorceror
Lysdexic;764890 said:
The problem is that it will never work. ICANN holds no jurisdiction over anything, they are strictly a set of rules and not laws. They cannot punish those who deviate, nor can they force the governments of those who deviate to punish. ICANN cannot even revoke an address or even mandate that a certain entity can no longer buy addresses.

I've wanted a .XXX or some other higher level domain for quite some time for ease of administration, but even the best admistrator knows that even if the whole world followed the rules and kept all the ill-sites in this range, there is no block on this planet that will work unless you literally pull the plug (and now with WiFi USB keyfobs, this don't even work). However, I have never wanted this for the aide of parents. If your kid is surfing porn, then it's your own fucking fault you weren't there with them to help guide them in this thing called life (I don't care if you choose to restrict or to educate, as long as you do something to protect them)... or did you forget that was your job in the first place?

Yeah, that is a good point.
 

Johabius

Knight
oiii88;764855 said:
The funny thing I see is they are going to allow .sex yet banned .xxx because of its sexual overtones.. Im almost certain the local hardware store wont be using a .sex url but a porn site would.
I will be among the first non-porn industry type people to register a .sex domain, just to fuck with people.
 

Admin God

Wanderer
Anti-Basic;764884 said:
Hi, there's this new thing called freedom, might want to check it out.
Aye. That's part of what makes the internet great.

@Topic: It's not that I don't like the .hotel or whatever its that I'm worried about it from a security standpoint. Part of my job description includes protecting stupid people on the internet from doing stupid things. Now say someone wants to spoof chase.com with chase.bank, most of the people I work with wouldn't think anything of it and probably think it's more legit. Yes I realize this already happens occasionally with .net, .org, chasebank.com, etc but the way I see it, companies can more easily protect themselves from spoofs right now because there are a limited number of similar names that they themselves can buy up. I'm sure it won't be more of an issue than it is now, but the thought it might be easier for this type of thing is enough to make me balk at the change.
 
Another big concern is what if a single travel company buys up .travel, and decides not to let other travel agencies use it.
 

Admin God

Wanderer
Anti-Basic;764929 said:
Another big concern is what if a single travel company buys up .travel, and decides not to let other travel agencies use it.

They'd have a hell of a lot of money tied up in that but yeah. Ebay has been saying they are going to buy alll .ebay
 

Vorspire

Knight
Whoever the hell can't use or remember to type .com or any other respective domain suffix for the website they want to get to, should be shot or strangled with their modem cable.

Why the hell do they think book-marks were invented?!
 

Vorspire

Knight
Anti-Basic;764929 said:
Another big concern is what if a single travel company buys up .travel, and decides not to let other travel agencies use it.

Impossible. Why hasn't Bill Gates bought every single .com? -for the same reason... He can't aford it.
 
You misunderstand, in order to offer domains like that, someone is going to have to own or run the TLD for each. Like currently, Verisign runs .com and .net. Thus a whole lot of TLDs themselves will be open for sale. Care must be taken to make sure that whoever buys a TLD like that is not biased or corrupted towards one company who might be potential register of a second level. (a similar situation is already happening with .asia and pool.com)

oh and my .travel example is moot cuz .travel already IS a TLD (owned by Tralliance) didn't know that till like 5 minutes ago.
 

Vorspire

Knight
No offence, but you need to read up on the Domain Name Service.

Domain Name System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Any computer can run a DNS server, but it must be registered and bound to the DNS Back-bone servers using A records etc.

Any computer can run a Name-Server, but that also has to be linked with your DNS server in order to propogate Domain Names correctly.

In theory, if the DNS Back-Bone supports ".travel" suffixes within it's NameServer for registering Domain Names, the amount of Domain Names available to each suffix is endless, just like with ".com", etc...

The only competition involved would be if two companies tried to buy something like "www.HelloWorld.travel"
 
Not talking about second level, talking about top level...

and unlimited possibilities for second levels doesn't mean they are required to allow them all to be registered. Hell, if you buy a TLD you might not be required to offer second level registrations to the public at all :confused:
 
Top