View Single Post
Old 08-22-2005, 05:19 PM   #11 (permalink)
Ravatar
Forum Expert
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 23
Posts: 1,472
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xir
I would like you to clarify what "this" and "issue" refer to? Are you refering to the implementation of the Hash table in .NET 1.0? If so what issue was it you were refering to that was fixed for .NET 2.0?
- Thanks
I'm referring to the lookup/storage method of Hashtables in .NET 2.0, and how the new method compares to the old one, as explained below.


Quote:
Originally Posted by noobie
Dictionary class is the strongly typed version of hashtable. So, they will waste the same space too. But accessing objects will need nomore explicit casting.
This is untrue, as you can see here.
Ravatar is offline   Reply With Quote