View Single Post
Old 07-28-2006, 03:25 PM   #10 (permalink)
Ashlar
Forum Expert
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southeast Missouri USA
Age: 35
Posts: 283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom
Your just making stuff up....
So you are calling me a liar Phantom?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom
This has no truth behind that statement, like I said another assemblie is not a good idea.
If you do not believe me in that i would restart the server 50 times to check and adjust an animation sequence...
too bad because i do.
You have not seen the things that i have been working on lately.

It takes my computer 2 minutes to start the server when the scripts are not cached.
Not making a thing up there, i wish i were.

50 restarts times 120 seconds (2 min) = 6000 sec.
6000 sec divided by 60 (back to minutes) = 100 minutes.
100 minutes minus 60 min ( 1 Hour ) = 40 minutes.
Total time 1 hour 40 minutes.

I admit that i have never started a cached server 50 times.
For me to start my server when it is cached takes 20 seconds, not lying on this either.

So the 17 min total time is
50 restarts times 20 sec = 1000 sec.
1000 seconds divided by 60 = 16.6 minutes which i rounded up to 17.

You have said a couple times that another assembly is not good, you have yet to say why or how.
I really want to know how a third assembly could be so bad as to outweigh the major time savings that i imagine possible from this idea.

This idea suggestion was directed at the RunUO team with constructive comments, discussion and feedback welcome from the community.

I respectfully request that you cease falsely slandering me as a liar and either butt out or constructively respond to this thread for a change.
Ashlar is offline   Reply With Quote