.NET Framework 2.0

[Phantom]

Recently I found the current release of RunUO actually works with the .NET Framework 2.0. Since I am going to start working on a extensive modification of major systems, and I wanted to use the .NET Framework 2.0, I decided I would make the required changes to use the updated methods.

I have not tested the modifications, but I see no reason why there should be a problem, took ever precaution to avoid errors. If you find an error I request that you post them in my bugreport section of my website. I will make any additional changes as I find them, to make the current release support the .NET Framework 2.0

You can download the current release by using TortoiseSVN and using the following link to the repository.

https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/seanchen-group

You can download the current package at the following location.

http://sourceforge.net/project/showf...ease_id=415610

If you find a bug you can report it to the following location

http://bugreport.seanchen.net/

Changelog:

Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\Account.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\NameList.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\BarGraphRenderer.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\PersistanceWriter.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\AccountComment.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\Accounts.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\PersistableType.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\PageQueue.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\ServerList.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\CrashGuard.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\PersistanceReader.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\BaseCommandImplementor.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\Email.cs  
Completed: At revision: 2

Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\Accounts.cs  
Sending content: C:\RunUO Update Pack\BaseCommandImplementor.cs  
Completed: At revision: 4

To browse the svn repoistory please, you can do so at the following link.

http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.c...Update%20Pack/

[brodock]

good work phantom.

[handsumblondy]

well i replaced the stock files with the update pack you supplied and well.. it says i need .net framework version 1.1.4322 or 1.0.3705... why would that be if these files were suposed to fix that?

[Asmir3]

Very good work Phantom except the part that u keep getting banned ever week

Originally Posted by Phantom

Lets put it this way, I am going to share my work no matter what, so you may as well not attack me for it. The only thing that will do is burn any bridges we might, and we will then have no chance to build anything in the future, and I don't forget what people say and do to me very easily.

Don't get all dramatic again Phantom. I offer you advice and you take it as an insult. If you can't bear the criticism don't post. I am simply pointing out that no one, especially those who think they "know what they are doing", should share their code with others without testing it.

You claim to know what you are doing but then you have a broken link and many typos in your opening post. Priceless...

[Aenima]

Originally Posted by handsumblondy

well i replaced the stock files with the update pack you supplied and well.. it says i need .net framework version 1.1.4322 or 1.0.3705... why would that be if these files were suposed to fix that?

Delete the config file and you should be sweet.

And Xanthos, the first link he posted requires you to use TortoiseSVN, not a usual web browser. This may explain why it appears broken.

[handsumblondy]

thanks aenima i'll give that a try.. have to wait until my other computer gets up and running though...

[titan0051]

Any chance someone could post the instructions for this..?

My Word wont open the instructions file for some wierd reason, and i cant find my .. um.. Win Xp CD anywhere..

It would be much appreciated

[Asmir3]

wtf does this have to do with anything about net framework 2.0? we dont care if u fight with ppl and we dont need to know the information. If i post everfight i got into there would be like 5 threads ever week about me fighting with someone. Phantom was nice enough to release this u dont need to make him look bad or anything just bec yall two fight before.

Originally Posted by Xanthos

Don't get all dramatic again Phantom. I offer you advice and you take it as an insult. If you can't bear the criticism don't post. I am simply pointing out that no one, especially those who think they "know what they are doing", should share their code with others without testing it.

You claim to know what you are doing but then you have a broken link and many typos in your opening post. Priceless...

Originally Posted by Asmir3

wtf does this have to do with anything about net framework 2.0? we dont care if u fight with ppl and we dont need to know the information. If i post everfight i got into there would be like 5 threads ever week about me fighting with someone. Phantom was nice enough to release this u dont need to make him look bad or anything just bec yall two fight before.

Don't get upset Asmir3 - there is no fight.

The reconstruction of my post is germane to this thread in that Phantom claimed here that he does not need to test his changes as he believes himself to be a seasoned vet. I disagree in anyone posting untested code and mentioned that in a post that has somehow gone missing.

I'm sorry, as much as I may like to, I cannot take responsiblity for Phantom looking bad.

[Augustus]

Originally Posted by Xanthos

Don't get upset Asmir3 - there is no fight.

The reconstruction of my post is germane to this thread in that Phantom claimed here that he does not need to test his changes as he believes himself to be a seasoned vet. I disagree in anyone posting untested code and mentioned that in a post that has somehow gone missing.

I'm sorry, as much as I may like to, I cannot take responsiblity for Phantom looking bad.

The fact is that you will get nothing out of posting about your disagreements. It only fuels the fire, a fire that we don't need here.

Originally Posted by Augustus

The fact is that you will get nothing out of posting about your disagreements. It only fuels the fire, a fire that we don't need here.

I'm not expecting anything - Asmir3 asked a question about my post I responded. I don't know that there is a fire to feed unless others feel compelled to continue this discussion. I suggest we return this thread to its purpose.

[titan0051]

Dont mean to double post, but it seems my request for help has gotten covered up by petty bickering..

Could someone please post the instructions for this mod, as for some reason my microsoft word will not open the attached file.

I downloaded the new version of sharp develop, and it only works with .net 2.0.. so any assistance with this would be helpfull.

Thanks.

[Kamuflaro]

Just downloaded it and directions.doc has size 0

[titan0051]

Well, i just compiled fine using .Net framework 2.0..

Am i missing something? I thought RunUO was not supposed to work correctly with .Net 2.0?

I havent logged in yet to see if everything is right.. but everything looks good so far.

[WeEzL]

Originally Posted by titan0051

Am i missing something? I thought RunUO was not supposed to work correctly with .Net 2.0?

AFAIK, it doesn't by default. Not unless you make the required changes to make it work.

[Asmir3]

thats wat i said in my first post wat does ur fighting have to do with this post

Originally Posted by Xanthos

I'm not expecting anything - Asmir3 asked a question about my post I responded. I don't know that there is a fire to feed unless others feel compelled to continue this discussion. I suggest we return this thread to its purpose.

[Malaperth]

Well, being the terminal fence sitter that I am, I can see both sides.

In a for-profit environment, if one checked in untested code more than once and it caused a problem, they would likely be unemployed.

In an environment such as this, which is free and subject to download choice, I do know for a fact that several very senior contributors here simply compile their code and if it compiles, they assume (correctly or incorrectly) that it is sufficient for general consumption based on their experience.

Whereas that may not be best practice, in this particular case, I would not think that anyone not quite adventurous that did not have a decent background in programming would bother to download this.

If they did and experienced problems, Phantom is here quite frequently to assist.

I do realize that this sounds like a defense of one in particular, but it is certainly not intended that way, just trying to add another perspective.

If you line up 10 people, and walk them through a room with nothing but a cardboard box in it, and then when they emerge from the room, ask them to describe what they saw, you will most likely end up with 10 different descriptions.

Does this effect coding for cash? Absodamnlutely not... Hopefully it inspires insight, however.

[Malaperth]

Ok, just because I'm an ass, I have to say this...

The first lines of code I ever wrote were completely bug-free. It was one of those test System.Out.Println, but that still counts, doesn't it?

bah... I know... shut up, stupid...

[Phantom]

I have updated the following files:

Accounts.cs
BaseCommandImplementor.cs

I will update the archive when I get a chance, its going to be a couple days, since all my work is on sourceforge's svn repoistory you can update the two files by hand till I do.