|
||
|
|||||||
| General Discussion General discussion for the RunUO community, all off-topic posts will be deleted. This forum is NOT FOR SUPPORT! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 23
|
Hi Folks!
I may have an opportunity in about 3 or 4 months, to provide directly off of fibre T1's in an offshore facility with fibre right to Miami. I'm wondering if there's any interest for monthly hosting pacakges, if the ping times are reasonable (they seem to be for other purposes, but I'll be running tests specifically with RunUO)? If you are interested, what do you feel is reasonable for: - Shared hosting (Multiple shards/Server) - Dedicated hosting (We provide hardware, etc, single shard/server) - Colocation (You provide everything) If we go ahead, all equipment will be Dell or Compaq dual processor machines, 2GB RAM/Machine minimum, full 24x7, backup power, and so on...we're talking world class facilities. If it makes enough business sense, quad or six-way systems with scads of RAM are an option. However, we would NOT be selling or "supporting" RunUO...not only would that be against the licensing policy, it would likely raise costs as additional support staff would be needed. We would be providing a service allowing you to run your RunUO shard where this is not an option with your current ISP. Any comments you have would be appreciated! Rigmore |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 23
|
Pheyte Said:
Quote:
![]() What do you think you would be willing to pay for the service? Rigmore |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Forum Expert
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 630
|
I just got a better idea when I posted this.
Cost + say 10 cents per user that stays for 10 days ateleast. That way at the end of the month you do a account clean with accounts > 10 days and pay cost plus the cost of those characters so you idealy pay for your bandwith. If your shard is low class you pay very little. However if its heavy duty you will have to pay for the connection? |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
For sure cost is required Static Loader that 's why i asked that
![]() I don't know Rigmore, i never made a shard before, that's why it's hard to say. The solution Static Loader gave sounds good, it should be more investigated in this way (if no one gives idea). But it depends of what all of this will cost to you ![]() I had same idea few month ago, but i wanted to raise an Association to try having money help's from state (it exists in France, i don't know for the other contry, you should investigate). But my friends didn't have much time to deal with it, so i abandon (too much things to do by myself). But for sure a project like this is interressing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 25
Posts: 4,868
|
I think a charge per meg or something on bandwidth would be reasonable for shared machines, so if you have few users, you pay relatively little, but if you have a large shard, you're better off paying for a dedicated server.....
Also, these would have some type of remote admin so people could log in and see a desktop, run runuo, etc... since telnet in windows sucks :-)
__________________
Zippy, Razor Creator and RunUO Core Developer The RunUO Software Team "Intuition, like a flash of lightning, lasts only for a second. It generally comes when one is tormented by a difficult decipherment and when one reviews in his mind the fruitless experiments already tried. Suddenly the light breaks through and one finds after a few minutes what previous days of labor were unable to reveal." ~The Cryptonomicon |
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Forum Novice
Join Date: May 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 220
|
Actually I think a hosting package at a low cost of maybe $30 per month for a shard allowing up to 20 users or so would be reasonable, atleast in my case. My wife and I are on a fixed income, and we're running our shard off our own ISP, which is causing problems with our huge downloads we like to do, and we only get like 10 or 15 users on a day. Sometimes not even that. If this is feasable, I'd be interested.
Sean |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|