Go Back   RunUO - Ultima Online Emulation > RunUO > New Join Forum

New Join Forum So your new to RunUO and looking to work with people that are new, this is the place.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-23-2006, 06:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 18
Default What notebook computer uses the least power and is compatable with UO?

What notebook/tablet uses the least amount of power and is compatable with UO? I am trying to figure out If it possible to run a server and clients with solar energy.
EmberSkyTwilight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2006, 12:55 AM   #2 (permalink)
Forum Novice
 
LadyRhia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Port Richey Fl.
Age: 51
Posts: 174
Send a message via Yahoo to LadyRhia
Default

this is a dumb question but... Why would you want to run a a UO shard on a Laptop? just curious.

never Play Leapfrog with a Unicorn
LadyRhia -AKA- Misty Dain [Owner Unicorn Heaven][Using RunUO1.0.0 local at this time hope to be public by 07/15/06 if all goes well]
LadyRhia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2006, 03:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
Forum Expert
 
WeEzL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Great White North!
Age: 33
Posts: 887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EmberSkyTwilight
What notebook/tablet uses the least amount of power and is compatable with UO? I am trying to figure out If it possible to run a server and clients with solar energy.
It's probably possible, though most likely difficult.

If you're looking currently, go for Pentium M, Core Solo, or Core Duo... though Core Duo will consume more than the previous two options (it's dual core). On AMD's side, there's the Sempron CPUs. If I remember correctly, they consume even less power than Intel's offerings, though I'd have to confirm that.

If you can wait a couple months, look into the Core 2 Duo series that will be appearing. The Merom core CPUs (Core 2 Duo) are rumored to have a power consumption of only 35 watts. Intel is also going to be releasing "ultra low voltage" versions that consume only 14 watts.
WeEzL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2006, 03:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 18
Default OK, Let me explain.

If I can generate 1650 watts with a generator. Run 2 dual core Xeon LV or Low Power AMD Opteron maybee 265's. Then I can set up a WI-FI HUB. Then the laptops would be my in house clients.
EmberSkyTwilight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2006, 06:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Forum Expert
 
Shadow1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: York, UK
Age: 27
Posts: 708
Default

I'd just like to say I don't recommend running a RunUO Server on a laptop. For development purposes one of our testservers is on my laptop and this is ok for test/development purposes but I would not want to run a live shard on it.
Laptops have not been designed to run 24/7. Yes it will be fine for a while but you will quickly reduce the quality of your battery/cooling/power supply unit. They will get *hot*.
Besides this, a desktop is cheaper and you can run it just fine with your generator. You can build a desktop/server with relatively low power usage as well, have far more effective cooler and a much better efficiency.
__________________
Shadow1980
Game Reviews, Jokes and Rants from real People
Shadow1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2006, 04:48 AM   #6 (permalink)
Forum Expert
 
WeEzL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Great White North!
Age: 33
Posts: 887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EmberSkyTwilight
If I can generate 1650 watts with a generator. Run 2 dual core Xeon LV or Low Power AMD Opteron maybee 265's. Then I can set up a WI-FI HUB. Then the laptops would be my in house clients.
Xeon LVs are expensive... especially dual core ones which will run you in the neighborhood of about $900 per processor.

If you really want dual CPU with dual cores, go Opteron or even go with the new Woodcrest core Xeons that Intel has just released. They beat even the Opterons for low power consumption. The dual core Opterons are 95W each while the dual core Woodcrest Xeons are 65W each.

Of course, for low power consumption, your best bet is NOT going multi-CPU at all.... go with a SINGLE CPU. I'm confused as to why you insist on dual CPU when you clearly do not need it. I am referring to the other thread you started where you asked what kind of system you would need and unless your specs have changed, to support a max of around 40 to 50 users on the fastest DSL connection you could get (heck even on a T1), you would need no more than an AMD Athlon X2 processor at most. Why the insistance on Dual CPU? Have you found other uses for your server besides RunUO? If so, then it might be understandable, if not, you'd be wasting your money... though if you've got the extra few thousand to throw away that a dual CPU system would cost you over an AMD Athlon X2 system, then the choice is yours. Just remember, multi-CPU is NOT cheap and there really is no such thing as a truly low power multi-CPU rig.
WeEzL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5