Go Back   RunUO - Ultima Online Emulation > RunUO > Core Modifications > Other

Other Cant find a category above, use this one! Core mods not listed above go here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2006, 10:05 AM   #1 (permalink)
Forum Novice
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vienna, Austria
Age: 21
Posts: 127
Send a message via ICQ to Arahil
Default RunUO 1.0 and .NET 2.0

When the .NET framework 2.0 was released there were some postings in the forums saying that there were some performance issues and that it is not recommended to use the new framework. But since RunUO 2.0 only runs on the 2nd version of the framework these flaws have obviously been fixed...

I'm using a highly customized version of RunUO 1.0 on my server, and it is impossible to upgrade to RunUO 2.0. Nevertheless, I want to use some of the enhancements of the .NET framework 2.0, so I would really like to know what those performance issues were and if they are really tricky how to remove/avoid them...
Arahil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2006, 11:43 AM   #2 (permalink)
Forum Expert
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Age: 27
Posts: 425
Default

there shouldnt be any performanse issue about RunUO 1.0 with .NEt 2.0
actually, it is most likely you'll get a better performance with .NEt 2.0

however, i would recommend using RunUO 2.0 since it has a lot better performance than 1.0 with the enchancements done.

it shouldnt take more than a couple days to convert custom scritps.
__________________
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
noobie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2006, 10:51 AM   #3 (permalink)
Forum Novice
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vienna, Austria
Age: 21
Posts: 127
Send a message via ICQ to Arahil
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noobie
there shouldnt be any performanse issue about RunUO 1.0 with .NEt 2.0
actually, it is most likely you'll get a better performance with .NEt 2.0
i have not tested the .net framework 2.0 yet, i just read that several times in the forums... even from some of the devs, if i remember that correctly

Quote:
it shouldnt take more than a couple days to convert custom scritps.
custom crafting, custom fighting system, xp&level-system, custom harvesting, all itemscripts & mobile-scripts removed and replaced with a database containing all the necessary information, accounts and playermobiles saved in databased and so on and so on and so on... no way
Arahil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 03:11 AM   #4 (permalink)
Forum Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 28
Posts: 21
Default

with .NET framework 2.0 you may notice a slight increase in CPU usage, but a decrease in RAM usage, atleast for me. While using programs that use 1.x framework compared to the same program that upgraded to 2.0 framework there is a slight (2-5%) usage for me and a decrease of 1-2% RAM usage. This is on my system that consists of a 2.4 ghz p4 with 2.0 gigs of pc3200 RAM. ymmv.
Total Failure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 03:13 AM   #5 (permalink)
Account Terminated
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 26
Posts: 3,846
Send a message via ICQ to Phantom Send a message via AIM to Phantom Send a message via MSN to Phantom
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Total Failure
with .NET framework 2.0 you may notice a slight increase in CPU usage, but a decrease in RAM usage, atleast for me. While using programs that use 1.x framework compared to the same program that upgraded to 2.0 framework there is a slight (2-5%) usage for me and a decrease of 1-2% RAM usage. This is on my system that consists of a 2.4 ghz p4 with 2.0 gigs of pc3200 RAM. ymmv.
The reported usage if you have more then one thread possible is not "correct" and it might not even be "correct" with a single thread.

See a recent post by Ryan to understand why this is.
Phantom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 03:14 AM   #6 (permalink)
Forum Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 28
Posts: 21
Default

Phantom thats why i said your mileage my vary.
Total Failure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 03:16 AM   #7 (permalink)
Account Terminated
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 26
Posts: 3,846
Send a message via ICQ to Phantom Send a message via AIM to Phantom Send a message via MSN to Phantom
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Total Failure
Phantom thats why i said your mileage my vary.
I thought you were saying something else, so thats why I said it, nevermind if you know what I am talking about :-)
Phantom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 03:40 AM   #8 (permalink)
Forum Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 28
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom
I thought you were saying something else, so thats why I said it, nevermind if you know what I am talking about :-)
I do know and its cool, you are a nice guy, and trying to help
Total Failure is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5