UOG VS Razor - RunUO

sliptongue69 · 09-17-2004, 08:25 PM

I am playing on a processor about 400mhz and compared Razor VS UOGateway. No matter if it's seperate or at the same time the Razored client seems to run a LOT smoother/faster. The UOG patched client seems to be a lot more choppy. Sucks while trying to multi client Razor AND UOG.

Phantom · 09-19-2004, 03:17 PM

Considering they use the same code, thats not possible.

sliptongue69 · 09-20-2004, 02:55 PM

How are you going to tell me it's not possible? Besides, what uses the same code? O.o

I ran two Razor clients on the same server, runs rather smoothly. When I run a Razor and a UOG client on the same server, the UOG client is quite choppy.

I don't get why this ^ is possible.

Phantom · 09-20-2004, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sliptongue69

How are you going to tell me it's not possible? Besides, what uses the same code? O.o

I ran two Razor clients on the same server, runs rather smoothly. When I run a Razor and a UOG client on the same server, the UOG client is quite choppy.

I don't get why this ^ is possible.

Because they use exactly the same decryption dll.

So the client is exactly the same.

Razor has the ability to make the client use a different prioity level which might be a factor.

But its just not physically possbile for them to be different, very large.

**Zippy** · 09-21-2004, 06:37 PM

Razor's "Smart CPU reduction" is responsible for this (nothing to do with decryption, but yes Razor uses UOG.dll (made by MrFixit from UOGateway) for encryption patching)... But current Razor versions can do multiclient anyways, so there's no need to run UOG just for that.

Phantom · 09-21-2004, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zippy

Razor's "Smart CPU reduction" is responsible for this (nothing to do with decryption, but yes Razor uses UOG.dll (made by MrFixit from UOGateway) for encryption patching)... But current Razor versions can do multiclient anyways, so there's no need to run UOG just for that.

I figured that was the only difference, I just knew about the dll, and I knew if that feature was enabled there wasn't a resonable explaination for what he claimed.

I did my best on the little knowlege I had I think

09-17-2004, 08:25 PM	#1 (permalink)
sliptongue69 Forum Expert Join Date: Mar 2003 Age: 24 Posts: 965	UOG VS Razor I am playing on a processor about 400mhz and compared Razor VS UOGateway. No matter if it's seperate or at the same time the Razored client seems to run a LOT smoother/faster. The UOG patched client seems to be a lot more choppy. Sucks while trying to multi client Razor AND UOG.

09-21-2004, 06:37 PM	#5 (permalink)
Zippy Administrator Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Baltimore, MD Age: 25 Posts: 4,868	Razor's "Smart CPU reduction" is responsible for this (nothing to do with decryption, but yes Razor uses UOG.dll (made by MrFixit from UOGateway) for encryption patching)... But current Razor versions can do multiclient anyways, so there's no need to run UOG just for that. __________________ Zippy, Razor Creator and RunUO Core Developer The RunUO Software Team "Intuition, like a flash of lightning, lasts only for a second. It generally comes when one is tormented by a difficult decipherment and when one reviews in his mind the fruitless experiments already tried. Suddenly the light breaks through and one finds after a few minutes what previous days of labor were unable to reveal." ~The Cryptonomicon

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-19-2004, 03:17 PM	#2 (permalink)
Phantom Account Terminated Join Date: Sep 2002 Age: 26 Posts: 3,846	Considering they use the same code, thats not possible.

09-20-2004, 02:55 PM	#3 (permalink)
sliptongue69 Forum Expert Join Date: Mar 2003 Age: 24 Posts: 965	How are you going to tell me it's not possible? Besides, what uses the same code? O.o I ran two Razor clients on the same server, runs rather smoothly. When I run a Razor and a UOG client on the same server, the UOG client is quite choppy. I don't get why this ^ is possible.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)