I know its been addressed but - RunUO

Neonbox · 09-09-2003, 04:49 AM

i know i knwo you've addressed this issue in many forms but i think it would be nice to have some sort of spanning because i'm running a p3 1.2ghz 256 ram and 25 out of 30 gig free
(i would say os but i had no diff in save time or speed actually 98 ran a bit smoother but anyway)
and saves take a min of 16 a ave of 30 and this is fully spawned
but the running speed isn't that bad (altho i ahven't had anyone but me)

my friend has a p4 900 with 256 ram xp and 10 out of 40 gig free and
saves take 121-340 seconds running speed is slow and this is mostly spawned
and i ahve unstable scripts and he just has bobsmart

but back to what my post was about

i think that someone from runuo.com should talk to the staff at google.com because they are the leading people in spanning software
and they are for the people and against the corporations(i just figure they are kinda likely to play along)

but ya i think maby you should rethink that abit maby make it optional or something

lordomega · 09-09-2003, 05:06 AM

Quote:

i'm running a p3 1.2ghz 256 ram

Quote:

my friend has a p4 900 with 256 ram

Increase your Ram.

**psz** · 09-09-2003, 08:47 AM

I've yet to ever see a P4 900.... :shock:

But yes, RAM would help. I have 1GB. My machine purrs.

System spanning is not gonna happen any time soon.

Phantom · 09-09-2003, 11:45 AM

This is all hardware issues.

Neonbox · 09-09-2003, 12:44 PM

thats the thing if i wanted to take a top end system just to run a uo server
i could use any other server but this one the first things i read on it said it was fast enough you wont need any spanning and its not true because i've seen many people with top end computers complaining

but as i guessed this is a futile attempt

but the main thing i was trying to get across was how many small programs google supports and the fact that they are the leader in spanning software

also his computer is underclocked because it wasn't running stable with xp

Phantom · 09-09-2003, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neonbox

thats the thing if i wanted to take a top end system just to run a uo server
i could use any other server but this one the first things i read on it said it was fast enough you wont need any spanning and its not true because i've seen many people with top end computers complaining

but as i guessed this is a futile attempt

but the main thing i was trying to get across was how many small programs google supports and the fact that they are the leader in spanning software

also his computer is underclocked because it wasn't running stable with xp

They also have custom scripts that cause problems.

XP with only 256 is a big issue considering XP will use 60% of that. Take in account if you run your client on that machine and yeah you will have long saves.

If you don't want to believe me, thats just fine, but I would say this is an hardware issuel

Neonbox · 09-09-2003, 04:10 PM

oh i'm sorry i'm sue you know what your doing and i didn't mean to offend you but i'm still saying that if you can combine the speed of runuo with spanning it would be a beautiful thing

Phantom · 09-09-2003, 04:21 PM

What do you mean by spanning?

Thread Saving? <-- Already possible reason I ask.

Smidget · 09-09-2003, 11:26 PM

I think he means using multiple computers to host a single shard. I forgot what the name for doing that is.. Is it clustering? Hrmm.. At least that is how I interpreted it.

If this is what he means, I believe it has been asked many times. From what I remember, the answer was always no. They aren't going to make Runuo be able to run a single shard across multiple computers.

Phantom · 09-10-2003, 12:14 AM

Plus it would be slower...

I can speak to almost 100% certainity that this will never happen. Know for a fact its been said the core would have to be rewrittne seeing as UO has a 2 year life span :-) because of UXO maybe 3 years.. I don't see that going to happen.

Neonbox · 09-12-2003, 08:24 PM

ahh well i should have excpected as such i guess i was just dreaming

but i still dont see how it would be slower maby the progression of runuo but not the servers run with it but oh well i think maby we should just close this thread

and yes thats what i ment about the word spanning

Phantom · 09-12-2003, 08:26 PM

It would be slower because you wouldn't have 3.5 ghz computers running your shard. Would be some crap servers, just like OSI does LOL

The resources to do this would I think make it slower then running it on the fastest server you can get.

09-09-2003, 04:49 AM	#1 (permalink)
Neonbox Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 47	I know its been addressed but i know i knwo you've addressed this issue in many forms but i think it would be nice to have some sort of spanning because i'm running a p3 1.2ghz 256 ram and 25 out of 30 gig free (i would say os but i had no diff in save time or speed actually 98 ran a bit smoother but anyway) and saves take a min of 16 a ave of 30 and this is fully spawned but the running speed isn't that bad (altho i ahven't had anyone but me) my friend has a p4 900 with 256 ram xp and 10 out of 40 gig free and saves take 121-340 seconds running speed is slow and this is mostly spawned and i ahve unstable scripts and he just has bobsmart but back to what my post was about i think that someone from runuo.com should talk to the staff at google.com because they are the leading people in spanning software and they are for the people and against the corporations(i just figure they are kinda likely to play along) but ya i think maby you should rethink that abit maby make it optional or something

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-09-2003, 08:47 AM	#3 (permalink)
psz UO Gamers: Demise Administrator Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Swamp Age: 29 Posts: 10,800	I've yet to ever see a P4 900.... :shock: But yes, RAM would help. I have 1GB. My machine purrs. System spanning is not gonna happen any time soon.

09-09-2003, 11:45 AM	#4 (permalink)
Phantom Account Terminated Join Date: Sep 2002 Age: 26 Posts: 3,846	This is all hardware issues.

09-09-2003, 12:44 PM	#5 (permalink)
Neonbox Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 47	thats the thing if i wanted to take a top end system just to run a uo server i could use any other server but this one the first things i read on it said it was fast enough you wont need any spanning and its not true because i've seen many people with top end computers complaining but as i guessed this is a futile attempt but the main thing i was trying to get across was how many small programs google supports and the fact that they are the leader in spanning software also his computer is underclocked because it wasn't running stable with xp

09-09-2003, 04:10 PM	#7 (permalink)
Neonbox Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 47	oh i'm sorry i'm sue you know what your doing and i didn't mean to offend you but i'm still saying that if you can combine the speed of runuo with spanning it would be a beautiful thing

09-09-2003, 04:21 PM	#8 (permalink)
Phantom Account Terminated Join Date: Sep 2002 Age: 26 Posts: 3,846	What do you mean by spanning? Thread Saving? <-- Already possible reason I ask.

09-09-2003, 11:26 PM	#9 (permalink)
Smidget Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 17	I think he means using multiple computers to host a single shard. I forgot what the name for doing that is.. Is it clustering? Hrmm.. At least that is how I interpreted it. If this is what he means, I believe it has been asked many times. From what I remember, the answer was always no. They aren't going to make Runuo be able to run a single shard across multiple computers.

09-10-2003, 12:14 AM	#10 (permalink)
Phantom Account Terminated Join Date: Sep 2002 Age: 26 Posts: 3,846	Plus it would be slower... I can speak to almost 100% certainity that this will never happen. Know for a fact its been said the core would have to be rewrittne seeing as UO has a 2 year life span :-) because of UXO maybe 3 years.. I don't see that going to happen.

09-12-2003, 08:24 PM	#11 (permalink)
Neonbox Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 47	ahh well i should have excpected as such i guess i was just dreaming but i still dont see how it would be slower maby the progression of runuo but not the servers run with it but oh well i think maby we should just close this thread and yes thats what i ment about the word spanning

09-12-2003, 08:26 PM	#12 (permalink)
Phantom Account Terminated Join Date: Sep 2002 Age: 26 Posts: 3,846	It would be slower because you wouldn't have 3.5 ghz computers running your shard. Would be some crap servers, just like OSI does LOL The resources to do this would I think make it slower then running it on the fastest server you can get.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)