Joeku;655048 said:I've heard that .Net 3.0 is more like .Net 2.1 in reality...
[/offtopic]
Since you are one of the Devs here, are you using 3.0 to run and/or compile?Jeff;655052 said:2.5 ya ...
noobie;655137 said:
InOverMyHead;655162 said:If it's 2.5 why is microsoft calling it 3.0?
Ray;655158 said:Because this is the language specification of c# 3.0, which is not included in .net 3.0 and still under development.