none at all, DreamCatcher, none at all.DreamCatcher said:And exactly what job has he got done? Our soldiers are getting killed over in Iraq . I'm totally against this stupid war....I am proud of our Men and Women in our Military and salute them.....But you can't push our beliefs down another countrys throat that doesn't want it....It is heartbreaking to see our soliders dying over there for WHAT cause?
woot, comic relief!Dodge1965 said:Meanwhile ............. Those naughty little Iranians, having seen the civilised worlds treatment of their neighbors in Iraq, surprisingly decide they want some nukes, can't imagine why.
Obviously their planned launching of intercontinental ballistic missiles from camels is a blatent disregard for animal welfare and they must be invaded asap so these atrocities can be stopped and we can teach them the correct western methods of camel husbandry.
Back home, males now bored with Debbie Does Bagdad, eagerly await the release of Debbie Does Tehran.
read last part of post, TMSTMSTKSBK said:Ummmmm...they don't want said weapons to fall into the hands of terrorists...and...aaah...come blow us up?
Just a small conjecture...
And hiroshima wasn't a terrorist attack? Think about it. We had already won the war, they just hadn't given an official surrender. They attacked a military base, we attacked two completely civilian cities....we wanted a show of power. we couldn't drop it in Germany though cuz the fallout could hit our allies, so we chose them. That's one of the reasons Einstein disaproved of the project at the end.(he was a Jewish refugee and really wanted Hitler's @$$ dead.)We are the only nation to use weapons of mass destruction. Just because we are the biggest and baddest nation out there, doesn't give us the right to prevent others from doing what we can. And That's according to the ideals from which OUR nation was founded....The oppressed has become the oppressor.TMSTKSBK said:Already did. Think harder
Dodge1965 said:The nukes on Japan were pretty much a show of strength to the Russians to stop them claiming too much territory after the war in europe had ended, so as it consisted of the killing of thousands of civillians just to prove a point it could be compared to an act of terrorism although I had never thought of it like that.
you got hijacked !!!! ..but it does kinda relate..but in any event im leaving this thread. people already slinging neg karma for political views...how mature.Asmir3 said:STOP GOING OFF TOPIC
was that a crack at us southerners being n00bs? j/kDodge1965 said:LOL yea, besides you did them a favor, building all those geiger counters to monitor their radiation levels really set them up nicely in the manufacturing of electronic equipment.
The resultant effects would have been devastating for the west had it not been done, imagine our kids growing up with no games consoles or hi tech electrical goods..................errrr which Bush would have coped with better than Kerry IMO.
hahahaha, but kerry would be lost, the spoiled brat...but now, looking back hed be better than bush...I really wish howard dean had won the dem primary tho..Kerrys such a dick. oh wait..im not in this thread! bah screw itDodge1965 said:LOL, na, I just think Kerry would find it difficult to cope without his Gameboy on those long trips, whereas Bush would be content with his GI Joe's.