<rant>All three suck. Nader, Bush, and Kerry all lie, cheat, and steal, and none of them are worth the time to pull the lever.
However, I KNOW what Bush lies about, and how he runs things, so there's NO chance I'd vote for him. I can't trust ANYONE to run a country when they've had 3 businesses go bankrupt prior, and caused (in three years) a larger deficet than *ALL PREVIOUS PRESIDENTS COMBINED IN THE LAST 200+ YEARS!* (Cept Clinton who, strangely enough, had consecutive surpluses
)
Oh wait, I refuse to vote because they all suck, and "Every Vote Counts" is bullshit (Even Pat Buchanan has said so) becauce even if 20,000 Californians vote R and the rest of the state votes D, they're votes won't be counted in the final "Electorial College" count, only the state amount will. Meaning, as in 2000, you can have a person with less TOTAL votes win a state/country.
Extended example: State A has a population of 50,000,000, and is worth 8 Electoral Points. State B has 10,000,000 and is worth 3 points.
If 26,000,000 people in state A vote D, and 24,000,000 vote R. State A votes R (8 points). If in state B *ALL* 10,000,000 vote R, R only gets... 3 points. EVEN THOUGH R HAD MORE VOTES!!!!!!!!
(True fact: Ross Perot got 15% of the popular vote when he ran, BUT because we use the Electoral College method, he is credited for 0% of the vote)</rant>
(Yes, I KNOW I'm going to regret posting :-P)