bzk90;750885 said:
Coming up with extreme examples that are far off topic does not make for a good debate; however, I will play along for now.
No they aren't. You are arguing that right and wrong are decided by consensus, and if the majority of a place think something is right, they should be allowed to do it. I just used separate examples.
You said that you don't care what they consider it and that the only thing that matters is what it actually "is." You call it perverted but the girls doing it call it "an easy way to make money."
No. SOME of the girls did. There are always cases of 2 abusers rather than a victim and an abuser. And they were arrested. And this wasn't child porn OR Enjo Kosai, it was selling their used panties. (And I'm the one taking it off topic?)
Why is your definition any more right than their definition? That's rhetorical btw, the answer is ITS NOT.
who is they? the very small minority of people in Japan who think that child molestation and pornography is right? (just because something is legal doesn't mean it reflects the will of the people, even in a representative democracy, far from the case)
You say that torture by waterboarding (or should I say "advanced interrogation techniques"?) is wrong. The government says it is the only way to prevent certain acts of terror. This is irrelvent to the argument because in America the constitution gurantees certain rights to humans, regardless of citizenship or criminal status. Also, on the global level we have things like the Geneva Code.
Torture is illegal and therefore it should not be used. If at some point torture is needed, the law must be changed in a manner that is within the bounds of the law.
That's called rewriting the constitution or finding a loophole in it. Torture to gain information is an entirely flawed concept, go watch Reservoir Dogs. Whether or not it should be used for punishment of very severe actions is an entirely different matter. (I'm actually FOR That)
I don't know whether enjo kosai is illegal or not but for the sake of the argument I will assume it isn't (it really doesn't matter because the logic works regardless of the legal status)
you missed a spot.
Enjo kosai is legal and therefore it doesn't matter whether you think it is right or wrong. If you don't like it then you should try to change it while remaining within the bounds of the law.
Enjo kosai is only legal because of the age of consent, and the fact that an actual "Date" must take place. We have the same loophole here (outside of NV) for adult prostitution, "Escorts" and it doesn't work either. D.C. Madam anyone? All one has to prove is that no actual 'date' occurred, and both the girl and client are in legal trouble. Also, fyi, as of 2003, child porn is defined, and illegal in Japan too. So everything regarding THAT just went out of your window.
Moral judgement has no place in deciding right and wrong except in the process of legislation. Once something has been deemed legal or illegal, the only thing that matters is understanding the "why."
Not really. You can use moral judgement in any way you want, including to look down upon others.
I still want to know how I, The guy who wants to fuck succubi, am sexually close minded.