I'm Back! Updated II a somewhat good one.

Maynza · Oct 1, 2006

Viago said:
in truth its not racism, due to the fact that minorities break the most laws. something like 70% of perps are black. its the trueth. simply for the fact that they are too lazy to actulay make something of them selfs, instead of breaking laws and being loosers. then they have the nearv to play the racist card.....idiots

Well, it is possible that 70% of perps are black because cops arrest blacks more often for minor offences. I'm not saying that, but it is possible.

ANYWAY, BACK@TOPIC plz. This wasn't meant to be a Bash Chamillionaire thread.

TheOutkastDev · Oct 1, 2006

Viago · Oct 1, 2006

DontdroptheSOAD said:
ANYWAY, BACK@TOPIC plz. This wasn't meant to be a Bash Chamillionaire thread.

yea cause that would be oh so to easy. lol

Zippy · Oct 1, 2006

TheOutkastDev said:
Alright, I'll bite on this topic, since there seems to be a large misunderstanding about whose really doing the banning around here.

Bzk: I've never banned you. Period. You and Joeku both have continuously accused me of carrying out grudges against you two, and it simply isn't true.

For the rest of you who think I'm the one whose ban happy around here. Unless you have access to the moderator control panel, you really are going on prejudice and assumption. But I'll humor you anyway:

This is the entire ban list through the moderator control panel.

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof2.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof3.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof4.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof5.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof6.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof7.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof8.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof9.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof10.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof11.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof12.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof13.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof14.png
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/TheOutkastDev/proof15.png

Images 3 through 6 have N/As as the person banning. These were probably previous bans before the database migration. There's quite a few that I cut out, and the list resumes in Image 7.

It's worth mentioning that that list is for connectuo.com, uogamers.com, uodemise.com, uodivinity.com AND runuo.com. *shrug*

Viago · Oct 1, 2006

downloading like 4gb atm so cant really do much lol. not that i need to look.

@zippy
lol dont forget that image site forums too!!! lmao

Kamuflaro · Oct 1, 2006

Ryan had some nice last words for someone who got banned for about a year. All capitals

What else do we have...
MMaximus ban by ASayre for: It's none of your buisiness why you're banned.
now that one is funny

especially compared with daat's all political correct ban reasons

bzk90 · Oct 1, 2006

TheOutkastDev said:
Bzk: I've never banned you. Period. You and Joeku both have continuously accused me of carrying out grudges against you two, and it simply isn't true.

You didn't ban me the second time, the first time was signed...

I find it highly unlikely that a mod is banning people under your name

TheOutkastDev · Oct 1, 2006

bzk90 said:
You didn't ban me the second time, the first time was signed...

I find it highly unlikely that a mod is banning people under your name

That's a blatant lie. I don't sign bans. Ever.

bzk90 · Oct 1, 2006

uhuh...

extra chars

WarAngel · Oct 1, 2006

TOD: You already gave him more than enough evidence. Let him smother himself in immaturity and retardation.

bzk90 · Oct 1, 2006

just finished looking through those images...perhaps I am blind and missed it due to the low res of those images...where are my 2 bans?

Viago · Oct 1, 2006

noticed alot of people that ive used to see on the forums. lol makes me feal old that im still kinda here....lol let alone able to still post lol. :eek:

@bzk90
it does not show past bans. just curent (ie 24hr or 1month ect ect) and forever bans....dont think it has history of who got bannd by who howmany times...ect ect

seeing the reasons why people gotton banned is kinda funny. and seeing who got banned for wat reason kinda...surprises me....

bzk90 · Oct 1, 2006

ahh thanks Viago...and yes the reasons are quite funny

It's amazing how many bans there are for ban evasion

David · Oct 1, 2006

A couple of my best bans are now n/a.

Seriously though guys moderating is not an easy job around here. It kinda bothers me to see a whole thread devoted to bashing moderators. Reminds me of the old days...

Maynza · Oct 1, 2006

David said:
A couple of my best bans are now n/a.

Seriously though guys moderating is not an easy job around here. It kinda bothers me to see a whole thread devoted to bashing moderators. Reminds me of the old days...

This thread wasn't dedicated to bashing mods. It was dedicated to an update on my status in rl as well as my ban status.

Viago · Oct 1, 2006

David said:
A couple of my best bans are now n/a.

Seriously though guys moderating is not an easy job around here. It kinda bothers me to see a whole thread devoted to bashing moderators. Reminds me of the old days...

yea ive moded befor and it can be a pain, just like running a shard can be too. alwasy some winey ungreateful lil pimplehead nagging an bitching lol.......lol its kinda why i lurk nowdays. stress isnt worht it.

Johabius · Oct 1, 2006

DontdroptheSOAD said:
And since there would be no abuse, I don't see them pulling that off.

Abuse can come in many forms. Not only physical, but emotional, sexual, and others. If the parents feel that any of those are true to them (not saying that it's the truth, but true to the parents from their perspective) they have every right to file for a PFA, and the law would be behind them.

When the Court is closed, you may be able to obtain the application (petition) for an Emergency Order from your local law enforcement office, usually the Sheriff's Department.
If you receive an Emergency Order, it will automatically expire at 5:00 p.m. on the next regular workday of the District Court.
Forms for obtaining a PFA order are on-line at http://www.kscourts.org/council/newforms.htm
When the Court is open, you may obtain the application (petition) for a Temporary Order from the District Court Clerk's Office.
The Court Clerk must verify your petition by witnessing your signature.
You may be asked to talk with a judge about why you think the Protection Order is necessary. In some jurisdictions, the Clerk will present your petition to the judge.
A Temporary Order is valid for up to 20 days. You must appear for the final hearing for the Protection From Abuse Order to be made final.

Also:

When you receive a Protection Order, the Court is empowered to order any or all of the following:

Restraining the defendant from abusing, molesting or interfering with the privacy or rights of the plaintiff or of any minor children of the parties.

Granting possession of the residence or household to the plaintiff, to the exclusion of the defendant.

Requiring the defendant to provide suitable, alternate housing for the plaintiff and any minor children of the parties.

Awarding custody and establishing a parenting plan with regard to minor children.

Ordering a law enforcement officer to evict the defendant from the residence or household.

Ordering support payments by a party for the support of a party's minor child or a party's spouse.

Awarding costs and attorney fees to either party.

Making provision for the possession of personal property of the parties and ordering a law enforcement officer to assist in securing possession of that property, if necessary.

Requiring the person against whom the order is issued to seek counseling to aid in the cessation of abuse.

Restraining the defendant from cancelling utility service to residence for 60 days.

Ordering or retraining any other acts necessary to promote the safety of the plaintiff and the minor children.

I'm not saying that this will happen. The procedure in Florida may be completely different from the procedure in Kansas, but it is a possibility.

Maynza · Oct 1, 2006

I think because it is dealing with me in florida and her in georgia, that it would be so complex they wouldn't do it.

He is an ex-pothead truckdriver and the mom is a christian substitute teacher. Nothing against either of those professions.

Johabius · Oct 1, 2006

DontdroptheSOAD said:
I think because it is dealing with me in florida and her in georgia, that it would be so complex they wouldn't do it.

That very well may be your saving grace

But like I said, keep on doing what you two are doing, just be careful. Life is too short to let a chance at love slip away

Avelyn · Oct 2, 2006

DontdroptheSOAD said:
Well the law in florida is that any people between 16-24 can have sex etc. I don't see how he could get a restraining order if we were boyfriend/girldfriend.

No no you misunderstand. That is a statutory law. All that means is you cannot be charged with battery on a minor (which is the Fla version of Stat Rape) by her parents. They still have full parental control over her till she's 18 and can do whatever they want to keep you apart including trespassing arrests, restraining orders, and kidnapping charges if you take her without permission. Do be careful!

I'm Back! Updated II a somewhat good one.

Formerly DontdroptheSOAD

Knight

Knight

Razor Creator

Knight

Page

Lord

Knight

Lord

Wanderer

Lord

Knight

Lord

Moderate

Formerly DontdroptheSOAD

Knight

Knight

Formerly DontdroptheSOAD

Knight

Sorceror