Rosetta;763641 said:
I write, I am one of those stereotypes, I hang around those stereotypes, I look up to those people, and at some point my observations may seem like a stereotype. But if anyone has to put a massive group of people into a few sentences then it will look like a stereotype. So see it as you will.
Yah, stereotyping occupations is pretty silly.
Rosetta;763641 said:
Artists are not often bubbly, they do it because it is an obsession, and they have to know human nature in order to create. But they aren't all suffering from a mass depression either.
Optimism has nothing to do with being bubbly. I'm not sure why you keep using this word and correlating the two. It makes me think of a cheerleader when you say it.
All I'm saying is, what you certainly don't see with professional artists or writers actually making a living with what they do, is them working on something and saying "Gee, this sure is going to suck when I'm done with it."
And if writers are pitching to publishers and editors, rejection is the commonplace. If they weren't truly optimistic about their work they would probably give up after the first 10 ("I know it's good, so I'm going to keep trying" not "This sucks, It's not even worth trying to pitch this anymore".
Rosetta;763641 said:
Who do you think creates the characters...?
If you're implying that every character created by an author is a direct reflection of themselves, that's a pretty absurd notion.
It's also absurd to think that a writer has to be unoptimistic in order for readers to relate to the characters that they create. Those two things aren't even related in any way shape or form.