It's preventing life from being conceived, which is exactly what we do with abortion.
You can call it whatever you want. I say it is legal action until it is born. I refuse to give full human rights to an organism which does not have human conciousness (if you don't know what I mean by human conciousness, it's that thing that we as humans have mentally that everything else doesn't; there is no word for it).
Along with that, it is impossible to provide two beings in the same body equal rights. One will automatically receive a veto over the other on this issue. You argue that we give the veto to nothing more than an organism, while I (and others) argue that we give the veto to a fully-fledged human being.
Again, you are so humanitarian about this, yet once they're born, you don't give a flying fuck about them. Why so hypocritical?
lol ^_^
Seriously though, I would accept more funding towards adoptions, foster homes, etc. While I am totally pro-abortion in the sense that I think it is a realistic option and should be promoted as such, I think providing alternate options is a great idea.