WarAngel said:
Yes, but from most of what I just read in that topic, all you guys are saying is, as psz said, "Script requests == bad". You merely don't want to have to read them, or see them there. Is that really a good argument?
I understand Phantom's point about it promoting people not sharing, but from what I have seen, that really isn't what normally happens. Maybe I have missed something in my forum experiences.
I see this rule in a different way.
Take a look at uogateway list, how many shards you see there that aren't activbe?
How many shards you see there that get player wiped every X months?
When I was playing UO what I liked to do is to join all this new shards that just started and see if I can help the admin a bit to get hiim going.
Out of the houndreds of shards I helped how many you think still online?
Only 1, and it wasn't updated at all since I stopped playing UO almost a year ago...
The facts are very simple.
If the admin don't know how to script than his shard is doomed.
Scriptors come and go, the admin isn't.
If the admin doesn't know how to update his shard and how to ser\deser stuff without wiping everything than he won't stick around.
Why do you insist on helping increase the number of 1 month shards in the list?
Aren't there enough already?
If I'll have anything to say about it I'll say that the rule must stay.
If a person doesn't have the time or will to learn how to take care of his own shard than his shard won't stick and therefore will be just waste of time, especially for the players that will play in it.
Those are
facts and you can argue about them as much as you want.
When you'll show me a shard with 50+ players on 24/7 that is active for atleast a year I'll reconsider my views.