Zaphieon;759483 said:
see I said everyone across the board was ignorant and you keep bring it back to being black only.. its ok.. I understand you dont have jack shit else to talk about..
Wow, I'm really sorry for thinking that you didn't have a problem with blacks. I must have totally misunderstood you. Ok let's review what you said so we can straighten out this misunderstanding.
Zaphieon said:
most black americans think of slavery as white people forced africans over here to do shit for them.
slavery is and always had nothing to do with the color of skin.. another ignorant ass thing people usually think.
I am by far the least racist person i know.. but i cant stand just plan out ignorance.. which sadly is heavy in the black communities in the US....
so in closing fuck black only anything..
this does not say ALL.. or most.. just heavy in black communities.. want some examples?
though i prefer a jew.. heard they are good with money... lol..
I forgot that you also made a racist remarks about Jews too. So I guess its not just the blacks, and its also the Jews. And Americans. And maybe gays.
Got it. Sorry if I left out anyone you are bigoted towards.
and you jackass.. IN MY FIRST POST.. the one you blow up about.. i said there were 2 cases in the 90's in the US of slavery.. BOTH of which were white people.. and those are the only ones that got busted..
The fact that you are trying to compare something like that to the legal, fully sanctioned enslavement of an entire race of people as property, based on nothing more than the color of their skin...not in fucking ancient egypt or in the stone age, but in the last 2 centuries...tells me you have no fucking concept as to the issues involved.
Hey, let's look at all these (definately NOT racist) laws in the U.S. that existed concerning the legal definition of a slave.
Virginia, 1650 - “Act XI. All persons except Negroes are to be provided with arms and ammunitions or be fined at the pleasure of the governor and council.”
Virginia, 1662 - “Whereas some doubts have arisen whether children got by any Englishmen upon a Negro shall be slave or Free, Be it therefore enacted and declared by this present Grand assembly, that all children born in this country shall be held bond or free only According to the condition of the mother."
Maryland, 1664 - “That whatsoever free-born [English] woman shall intermarry with any slave [...] shall serve the master of such slave during the life of her husband; and that all the issue of such free-born women, so married shall be slaves as their fathers were.”
Virginia, 1705 - “All servants imported and brought into the Country [...] who were not Christians in their native Country [...] shall be accounted and be slaves. All Negro, mulatto and Indian slaves within this dominion [...] shall be held to be real estate.”
Virginia, 1667 - “Act III. Whereas some doubts have arisen whether children that are slaves by birth [...] should by virtue of their baptism be made free, it is enacted that baptism does not alter the condition to the person as to his bondage or freedom; masters freed from this doubt may more carefully propagate Christianity by permitting slaves to be admitted to that sacrament.”
Virginia, 1682 - “Act I. It is enacted that all servants [...] which shall be imported into this country either by sea or by land, whether Negroes, Moors [Muslim North Africans], mulattoes or Indians who and whose parentage and native countries are not Christian at the time of their first purchase by some Christian [...] and all Indians, which shall be sold by our neighboring Indians, or any other trafficking with us for slaves, are hereby adjudged, deemed and taken to be slaves to all intents and purposes any law, usage, or custom to the contrary notwithstanding.”
Virginia, 1705 (see Slave Codes of 1705) -- "All servants imported and brought into the Country...who were not Christians in their native Country...shall be accounted and be slaves. All Negro, mulatto and Indian slaves within this dominion...shall be held to be real estate."
But racism had nothing to do with that! We would have had white slaves, except that they just cost too much because they were so superior to the black ones.
farmers in the US still practice debt slavery today... white, black, mexicans, asias.. it doesnt matter..
Hey dipshit. Pay attention. We're not on the topic of economics. We're talking about one person owning another person as physical property that can be bought, sold, or killed at the owner's leisure.
the fact that your stuck on its a black and white issue just shows how fucking stupid you are..
The only thing thats stuck is that big stick crammed up your ass.
theres tons of asians that are in the US that are slaves to snakehead organizations today..
Ok "Mr. Generalities", name them.
Then after that, show me the laws that makes their enslavement something that is legal and sanctioned.
And show me how these are NOT exceptions and that this in some way compares to the mass enslavement of blacks.
You're grasping at straws trying to make a point that doesn't stand up.
they basically sell themselves for a trip to the us to hopefully get free and send there family money back..
I think you have a pretty broad definition of "slavery". I further think your broad definition of slavery might work in whatever backwater country you're from, but would likely get your ass kicked by pissed off ignorant people...er, excuse me, I mean black people...over here.
and that has nothing to do with race.. its about GREED.... heres an example that you might can understand..
if store A and B are 2 blocks from each other.. store A has the brand of nike's you want for $120. but store B has the same nike's for $30 ---- which store do you buy your nikes from??
Anyone but the black guy. See, I understand.
jackass.. i know its hard to understand that racism use to not be an issue at all. it was all about trade and gold.. and slavery wasnt invented by whites owning blacks.. its really hard i know..
Racism doesn't just exist between whites and blacks either. Yeah, that's really hard, I know. But try to wrap your tiny little mind around this.
Whenever one race feels they are superior to another race, and have the right to enslave members of another race - THAT'S RACISM.
When someone makes sweeping generalities about another race. For example, hmmm, I don't know, how about...saying that ignorance is widespread in black communities.... THAT'S RACISM.
And constantly insulting an entire nation of people ISN'T racism. Nah, that's more like BIGOTRY.
And talking up about how superior you are and how ignorant everyone else is? That's not RACISM or BIGOTRY. No, that's just being an arrogant prick.
So let's sum it up. You are a racist, bigoted, arrogant prick.
but your have to pick up a book not a US school book that shit was wrote by fat white european loving americans, a real history book. like christopher columbus most recent biography.. learn the turn meaning of greedy europeans.. columbus day could be called hilters day.. and it would be about the same.. they both commetted genocide.
Where you live, it would be known as "Aryan Asshole Day".
You're great at generalizing entire races and nations. Where are you from, "New Bigotslovokia?"
gonna use hellrazors line.. you should say that to a black dude.. and where i say black dude.. i mean bull dike.... and the race doesnt matter.. though a black bull dike might deliver a better ass whoppen.. it may come off racist buy black chicks usually fight better then white chicks..
For such an enlightened bigot you sure don't make much sense. Are you trying to say you want a black chick with a penis to fuck you in the ass?